Resize Image Without Losing Quality | Photoshop

Enjoying our PDF solution? Share your experience with others!

Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars by our customers

The all-in-one PDF converter loved by G2 reviewers

Best Meets
Easiest Setup
Hight Performer
Users Most

Resize Image Without Losing Quality | Photoshop in just three easy steps. It's that simple!

Users Most
Upload your document
Users Most
Resize Image Without Losing Quality | Photoshop
Users Most
Download your converted file
Upload document

A hassle-free way to Resize Image Without Losing Quality | Photoshop

Upload Document
Best Meets
Convert files in seconds
Best Meets
Create and edit PDFs
Best Meets
eSign documents

Questions & answers

Below is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.
Think about it Reducing the size of an had detail on that scale to begin with. However you may not notice the missing resolution. If the s by zooming into them to see a part of the resolution without losing any quality is by starting with an resolution aren better than others. Books and PhD dissertation have been written studying various ways to do this. You didn say whether you are looking for a personal service or a free web site some ready made free or paid software or aputer algorithm. Rather than trying to repeat the extensive literature about this let me just point you in the right direction. Here is a good StackOverflow Q&A on this topic What is the best -downscaling-algorithm-quality-wise The consensus of that discussion is that the Lanczos method is considered the best by many. The ImageMagick website has a detailed articleparing these methods at Resampling Filters #unix Windows #macosx iOS interpolation software.
Well there no free lunch and there is no way to make an size of a digital and you cannot increase it (without new information added). For instance if the information whether the person in the you cannot introduce it however way you blow up the you can make it as large as you like without losing quality; so there are some subtleties. But in practice there are preferred ways of resizing larger you basically introduce new pixels pixels that you actually don know the actual values of. But you can guess right? And there are ways of making a better guess based on what is already there in the processing. A typical . Although you cannot introduce detail that was not there in the first place; so sharpening actually is a perceptual trick and not an increase in the quality (intrinsic resolution) of the by looking at a lot of images at low and high resolutions.
Need to resize a photo? Don have Photoshop? Not to worry. You could easily resize an via Fotor How to Resize an Image Using Fotor? Go to Fotor s and click Get Started button on the homepage. ordered-list 2. Click the Open button on the top bar to upload the s 88 987 s without losing quality . Also you can check out Fotor s other tools such as photo effects portrait retouching background remover ect. That all. Thanks for reading and hope you find this ge useful! D
s RESIZE and SHARPEN an Image in Photoshop without Losing Sharpness and Quality is Difficult Watch the Video Above s or Follow These Steps I have done a lot of experimenting to find the Absolute Best Way to reduce the size of an for social media without it beingpressed by their . You can adjust the amount of sharpening by click on the Opacity button on the right side near your layers. Move it between 55375% for optimal sharpening (without overdoing it). Step 9 Click on File then Save for Web . Make sure you have the following selected with these amounts JPEG Make a Check Mark next to Optimized Embed Color Profile Convert to sRGB . Quality 7 Preview Monitor Color (Make sure to have a correctly calibrated monitor) Image Size - W 248 (Should be already at this number if you followed Step 2). Percent 1 % Then click Save . If you are unsure of any of these steps you can always watch this video s I made that takes you through it step by step.
If you were to print your . As Harry Parker user 1618353 has said to enlarge without resampling to 48 x 42 inches you need to print at 75dpi. If you want more pixels you need to resample and rescale by about a factor of 2. But resampling or reinterpolating the pixels in an will look absolutely fine at normal viewing distances. You need to read this 1 - Print Size & Viewing Distance If you check the Viewing Distance chart shown at the above you will see that a large print such as yours doesn need to have such a large DPI. 75 DPI is more than enough for a print that size. How to rescale it? You really don need to do anything. Just ask your printer to print it at the size you want. If you are printing it yourself simply change the print size without resampling using Adobe Photoshop or the free software GIMP . In Photoshop italic open the . Select the crop tool. and in the tool options along the top of the screen 48in and 42in in the and leave the resolution field blank - if there is a number in there just delete it. Click and drag to make your crop. Hit Enter to accept the crop. Save your and click Image Print Size change the size in inches. If you want to crop the to make your crop hit Enter to accept the crop. Export your image using File Export as.
Does size mean number of bytes it occupies in storage or and in pixels? People use the term size to refer to both of these. If you want to reduce the number of bytes without reducing the number of pixels there are several possibilities depending on how the is currently upressed (e.g. BMP upressed TIFF) you can save it in a losslesslypressed can be read in its original form exactly with no loss of information or quality at all. If the using a lossypression format (e.g. JPEG JP2) instead. This deliberately removes some in less space than losslesspression would but the encoder tries to do this in a way that is invisible or minimally visible to the human eye. This is best to do just before saving a final version of the processing operations is a bad idea because it can cause artifacts. If the size against visual quality. But you generally have to accept some loss of quality to get a reduced size. On the other hand if reduce the size means fewer pixels that generally means losing high-frequency information. The more pixels used to store an . So if you reduce size you are usually losing quality - even if the output is upressed or losslesslypressed.
Everything about this indicates he is an amateur designer (I know he a programmer but he assuming the function of a designer working with logos) who is not working in the most conducive way and not how professionals do it. That all forgiven but I suspect he lacking essential knowledge to offer you a high quality logo. Here are a few points to consider A logo designed in Illustrator should be in vector so there is no reason why it would look blurry. But notice how it not only blurry but pixelated as well. What he might have done is exported a JPG that was too small opened it in Photoshop and then scaled the picture up because he needed a bigger have tested this and if you make the picture smaller and then big again you only get a blurry effect. However if you manually make the together with the canvas (Transform rather than Image Size) you do get these pixel artifacts. It seems he exported the up in that or perhaps he used a small in conventional pixels. If however he did not work with rasterized images and stayed with vectors then perhaps something went wrong working with SVG or the code implementing the SVG file. This is beyond your question but I would urge your designer to make a couple of necessary changes because as of right now he took your font and made the Ts bigger and called it a logo. I would say he not done scaling up the Ts he effectively increased the weight of the Ts. I would probably have decreased the weight of the Ts to match the weight of the other letters again. In principle you could let the Ts remain more fat but I would at least decrease the of the Ts a bit so the horizontal strokes are brought closer to the top of the other letters. Your Ts are simply too tall right now. Also the requires kerning. The space needs to be decreased between the following letters to make sure the spacing is consistent T_U U_B E_T T_R. This is a very simple logo so there should be no reason why this logo couldn be high quality. Like I said vector designs are inherently sharp. Is the logo you are showing what he sent you or what on your website? If it on your website he should upload a sharp JPG or work with the SVG format. Alternatively he could upload the font and work with but that means he can make any adjustments to the design unless perhaps he modifies the face itself which is probably not what youre showing is what you received that not good enough. He has to give you the file in EPS format (or AI though many clients who don work with Illustrator themselves get EPS) and probably a sharp PNG or JPG. Since your logo is simple and will be used online I would advice SVG or PNG. You have received several reactions from (professional) designers and theyre all equally confused as to what your designer has done here or why this logo couldn be in high quality. If your designer genuinely believes it couldn be in high quality I suspect he is ignorant about the design process and needs to learn a few more things before he can offer high quality logos. I suspect in his mind offering you a high quality logo is indeed not possible because he is not working in a correct manner. He says he being constricted by the design of the logo but I suspect he wrong. I think he being constricted by his way of working.
Perhaps your problem is interpolation. In the first window when you open PS preferences you'll see a pull-down menu for interpolation Bicubic Bilinear etc. Choose one return to your document with the transformed Smart and merely Transform without actually moving anything; the Smart will re-render into the parent document using the new interpolation settings. Unsatisfied? Choose another algorithm and null-transform again.
I guess you could use the pen tool and export to an .svg file. Really you should be using Adobe illustrator for a vector based (fully scale-able) solution. The thing to ask yourself is do I really need to have an image that can resize to any size? italic Generally speaking no. The accepted means of designing for multiple monitors is to create slightly larger graphics that can scale down a bit AND to create more than one set of buttons for different uses. When I design a website or an app for a customer I will create buttons which are designed for a phone a set for a tablet and a set for a desktop. I also create a .css style sheet which adjusts the layout of the page accordingly as well. Hope this helps. ~A5